A Comparative Analysis of E-learning and Conventional Teaching Methods in Higher Education

Abstract

The rapid advancement of technology has transformed the landscape of
education, with e-learning emerging as a popular alternative to
conventional teaching methods in higher education. With the
widespread availability of online resources, e-learning has gained
popularity as an alternative or complementary method to traditional
face-to-face instruction. However, the extent to which e-learning can
match or surpass the outcomes achieved through conventional teaching
methods remains an open question. This study aims to address this gap
in knowledge and provide a comprehensive analysis of both
approaches. This comparative analysis research specifically
investigates and compares the effectiveness, advantages, and
challenges associated with e-learning and conventional teaching
methods in the higher education context. By examining these factors,
the study intends to provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses
of each method, contributing to the understanding of their implications
for teaching and learning in higher education. Research was conducted
with the assistance of teachers from three higher educational institutions in Anambra State, Nigeria. A questionnaire survey was
designed and distributed to voluntary respondents, keeping in mind key
areas of conventional and e-learning teaching methods. The data was
analysed using simple sampling proportions and Modality of
Preference theory, propounded by Neil Fleming (1987). The theory was
designed to help students and others learn more about their individual
learning preferences. Findings indicate that adopting contemporary
digital technology in higher education offers greater benefits, but
teachers should take into account student requirements, class
objectives, and potential challenges before choosing a teaching
technique. It equally advocates the cooperation of both teaching
approaches for optimal learning outcomes. The study will contribute to
a deeper understanding of the benefits and limitations of both
approaches, offering insights to educators, institutions, and
policymakers for informed decision-making.